How Joint Commission Accreditation Affects Medicare Funding

The Joint Commission is a private organization that accredits healthcare organizations in the United States. It plays a significant role in ensuring that hospitals meet the requirements for participation in Medicare and Medicaid programs. To receive federal funding from Medicare or Medicaid, healthcare providers must demonstrate compliance with health and safety standards, known as Conditions of Participation (CoPs). The Joint Commission's accreditation process involves unannounced surveys, where it evaluates hospitals against these CoPs. While the commission's findings are generally not made public, its accreditation decisions are recognized by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), allowing accredited organizations to receive Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements. The commission's role in hospital funding is further influenced by its “deemed status agreements with CMS, which streamline the reimbursement process for accredited providers. However, the commission's authority has been questioned, and its ability to enforce standards and ensure the quality of care has faced scrutiny.

Joint Commission's role in hospital Medicare funding

The Joint Commission is a private organization that accredits healthcare organizations in the United States. It is based in Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, and was formerly known as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) and, before that, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH).

The Joint Commission plays a significant role in hospital Medicare funding by providing accreditation, certification, and verification programs that are widely recognized and relied upon by state agencies and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

To participate in and receive federal payments from Medicare or Medicaid programs, healthcare organizations must meet specific government requirements, including compliance with health and safety standards. The Joint Commission is one of the recognized national accrediting organizations that can certify a healthcare organization's compliance with these standards. Healthcare organizations that achieve Medicare certification through a Joint Commission "deemed status" accreditation survey are determined to meet or exceed Medicare and Medicaid requirements.

The Joint Commission's accreditation and certification programs are recognized in all 50 states for specific provider types, including home health, hospice, durable medical equipment, and home infusion therapy providers. This recognition allows accredited organizations to receive Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements. Additionally, in many states, Joint Commission accreditation is accepted to meet licensing renewal activities and can be a condition for higher rates of reimbursement or increased network participation.

The Joint Commission's role in hospital Medicare funding is further strengthened by its ability to conduct unannounced surveys of healthcare organizations, ensuring that they continue to meet the applicable standards. While the commission does not make its hospital survey findings public, it does provide the accreditation decision, the date of accreditation, and any standards cited for improvement.

It is important to note that the Joint Commission's authority and recognition as an accrediting body are subject to periodic review and approval by CMS and state agencies.

Joint Commission's accreditation process

The Joint Commission's accreditation process is a commitment to providing patients with the safest and most reliable care. It is a private organization that evaluates organizational compliance with performance standards designed to improve quality and safety for patients. The process is patient-centered, data-driven, and focused on evaluating actual care processes. It is also intended to be a learning experience for the organization's staff. The Joint Commission provides education and "best practice" guidance to help staff improve their performance. The accreditation process seeks to identify known and/or unknown risks to quality and patient safety by conducting a meaningful assessment.

The Joint Commission's survey process is a key component of its accreditation process. The surveys are generally conducted every three years, but some settings, such as laboratories, are surveyed every two years. The unannounced full survey means the organization does not receive advance notice of its survey date. Surveys occur 18 to 39 months after the organization's previous unannounced survey. The Joint Commission began conducting unannounced surveys on January 1, 2006.

The scoring and decision process for accreditation is based on an evaluation of compliance with Joint Commission standards and other requirements. Compliance with the standards is scored according to specific performance expectations called elements of performance. The accreditation decisions that can be awarded are: Limited Temporary Accreditation, Accreditation, Accreditation with Follow-up Survey, Preliminary Denial of Accreditation, and Denial of Accreditation. An organization’s accreditation cycle is continuous, as long as the organization has a full, unannounced survey within 36 months of its last survey and continues to meet all accreditation-related requirements.

The Joint Commission's accreditation and certification programs are widely relied upon by at least one agency in each state across multiple provider types in making licensure decisions, as well as for participation in a state’s Medicaid program. The most common form of state reliance on accreditation is to accept the Joint Commission’s survey process instead of the state agency conducting a routine licensure inspection. In addition, some state regulations mandate accreditation as a condition of licensure or certification.

Healthcare organizations that achieve Medicare certification through a Joint Commission "deemed status" accreditation survey are determined to meet or exceed Medicare and Medicaid requirements. Voluntary deemed status through the Joint Commission is available for opioid treatment programs and ventricular assist device (VAD) destination therapy. In addition, the Joint Commission provides CMS with a listing of, and related documentation for, deemed organizations receiving adverse accreditation decisions.

Joint Commission's limitations in enforcing standards

The Joint Commission (formerly the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and previously the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals) is a private organization that develops standards with input from healthcare professionals, providers, subject matter experts, consumers, and government agencies. These standards are used to evaluate and improve the performance of healthcare organizations.

Despite its longstanding role in hospital accreditation, the Joint Commission faces several limitations in enforcing standards:

• Lack of Public Accountability: The Joint Commission is a private organization, and its survey findings are generally kept confidential. While it provides the accreditation decision, the date of accreditation, and areas for improvement, specific survey findings are not made public. This lack of transparency can hinder public trust and accountability.
• Limited Enforcement of Certain Standards: While the Joint Commission's standards cover a wide range of topics, they have been criticized for their relative weakness in enforcing environmental and life safety code standards. This indicates that there may be specific areas where their enforcement capabilities are more limited.
• Challenges in Assessing Quality of Care: The Joint Commission, along with HCFA, faces challenges in assessing the quality of care provided in hospitals. This is due to the complex interplay between easily regulated aspects (such as staff credentials and committee meetings) and more subjective aspects that directly impact quality (such as patient treatment and health outcomes). The lack of adequate clinical indicators and research validation further complicates their ability to assess and enforce quality standards effectively.
• Outcome Standards: Despite decades of efforts, developing valid and reliable outcome standards remains a challenge. Outcomes are influenced by numerous factors beyond hospital care, making it difficult to attribute adverse or improved outcomes solely to the quality of care provided. While indicators of quality are used, they are often process-oriented or structural rather than outcome-oriented.
• Tension Between Accreditation and Certification: The Joint Commission has historically resisted the push to become a certifier or regulator, as it primarily sees itself as an accreditor. However, the public's desire for accountability has created tension, leading to legislative changes that granted HEW (now Health and Human Services) the authority to conduct "validation" studies of accredited hospitals. This shift towards a regulatory role may strain the Joint Commission's resources and original purpose.
• Number of Standards: The Joint Commission has been criticized for having an excessive number of standards, with 2600 at one point. This abundance of standards can create a burden for hospitals and doctors seeking accreditation, leading to calls for a more focused and relevant approach.
• State-Specific Variations: While the Joint Commission's accreditation is recognized by many states, there are state-specific variations in the level of reliance and acceptance. For example, survey findings are confidential in most states but are public documents under state law in a few states, including New York, Pennsylvania, and Arizona. This inconsistency can create challenges in enforcing consistent standards across all states.

While the Joint Commission plays a significant role in hospital accreditation and Medicare funding, these limitations highlight areas where its enforcement capabilities and standards could be improved or adjusted to better meet the needs of healthcare organizations and the public.

Joint Commission's role in hospital licensure decisions

The Joint Commission is a private, independent, not-for-profit organization that accredits and certifies more than 22,000 healthcare organizations and programs in the United States, including hospitals and healthcare organizations that provide surgery, behavioral health, home health care, laboratory, and nursing care services. The Joint Commission is the oldest and largest standards-setting and accrediting body in healthcare in the US.

The Joint Commission's role in hospital licensure decisions is significant. It is widely relied upon by at least one agency in each state across multiple provider types to make licensure decisions. The Commission's accreditation, certification, and verification programs are used by various state agencies for licensing, certification, designation, or contracting purposes. The most common form of state reliance on accreditation is to accept the Joint Commission's survey process instead of conducting a routine licensure inspection.

Healthcare organizations that achieve Medicare certification through a Joint Commission "deemed status" accreditation survey are determined to meet or exceed Medicare and Medicaid requirements. The Joint Commission provides a listing of, and related documentation for, deemed organizations receiving adverse accreditation decisions to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

The Joint Commission's standards are updated regularly to reflect advancements in healthcare and medicine. They address various aspects, including patient rights and education, infection control, medication management, and preventing medical errors. The Commission's surveyors are highly trained experts, including doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, and laboratory medical technologists. They conduct unannounced surveys, selecting patients randomly and using their medical records to evaluate standards compliance.

While the Joint Commission plays a crucial role in hospital licensure decisions, it is not the only accrediting body. Other healthcare accreditation organizations in the US include the Accreditation Commission for Health Care, the American Osteopathic Association, the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities, and the Community Health Accreditation Program.

Joint Commission's impact on hospital quality assurance

The Joint Commission is a private organisation that accredits healthcare organisations in the US. It is recognised by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a national accrediting organisation for hospitals that wish to participate in Medicare or Medicaid programs.

To receive federal payment from Medicare or Medicaid, a healthcare organisation must meet government requirements, including a certification of compliance with health and safety requirements. The Joint Commission provides hospitals with accreditation and certification to meet these requirements.

The Joint Commission's accreditation and certification programs are widely relied upon by at least one agency in each state, and are used as a condition for higher rates of reimbursement or increased network participation. The Commission's accreditation is also accepted to meet some or all licensing renewal activities.

The Joint Commission's efforts to develop and apply quality assurance standards are hampered by the lack of adequate and valid outcome standards. Medicare and the Joint Commission have tried to mandate quality assurance processes in which hospitals use indicators of quality to examine the quality of care. However, few clinical indicators have been adequately validated through research.

The Joint Commission's accreditation process includes unannounced full surveys, which occur 18 to 39 months after the previous survey. The organisation does not make its hospital survey findings public, but it does provide the accreditation decision, the date accreditation was awarded, and any standards that were cited for improvement.

Frequently asked questions