Russia's Attack On A Maternity Hospital: Why?

why did russia bomb a maternity hospital

On March 9, 2022, the Russian Air Force bombed Maternity Hospital No. 3 in Mariupol, Ukraine, killing at least four people and injuring at least sixteen, leading to international outrage and condemnation. This attack occurred during a ceasefire and humanitarian corridor evacuation, with Russian officials claiming the hospital was used by Ukrainian armed forces and that the airstrike was staged. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described the bombing as genocide, a sentiment echoed by other world leaders, who called for accountability and an end to the targeting of innocent civilians.

Characteristics Values
Date 9 March 2022
Location Mariupol, Ukraine
Hospital Name Maternity Hospital No. 3
Type of Hospital Children's and maternity hospital
Number of People Wounded At least 17, including women in labour
Number of People Killed At least 4, including a pregnant woman and her baby
Damage to Hospital Colossal; the front of the building was ripped away, windows blown out, and medical equipment covered in rubble
Reactions and Responses Described as a war crime by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Josep Borrell (EU head of Foreign Affairs), and British armed forces minister James Heappey; the Vatican's Secretary of State called the bombing unacceptable; the White House condemned the "barbaric" use of force against civilians
Russian Claims The bombing was justified due to the presence of Ukrainian armed forces at the hospital; Russian Minister of Defence spokesperson Igor Konashenkov stated that Russian military aircraft did not carry out any tasks to hit targets in the area

shunhospital

The Russian government's justification for the bombing

On 9 March 2022, the Russian Air Force bombed Maternity Hospital No. 3, a hospital complex functioning as a children's hospital and maternity ward in Mariupol, Ukraine. The attack killed at least four people, injured at least sixteen, and caused at least one stillbirth.

The Russian government justified the bombing of the maternity hospital by claiming that Ukrainian armed forces were present at the hospital and using it as a base. Russian UN representative Vasily Nebenzya stated on 7 March that the hospital was being used by Ukrainian armed forces as a firing point. However, media organizations and Ukrainian authorities dismissed these claims as false, stating that the hospital was clearly identified as a medical facility and that no Ukrainian soldiers were present.

Sergey Lavrov, the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs, confirmed that the bombing was a deliberate action and that they had presented factual information to the UN Security Council about the presence of the Azov Battalion at the hospital. He claimed that all pregnant women, nurses, and staff had been told to leave. Igor Konashenkov, a Ministry of Defence spokesperson, denied that Russian military aircraft had carried out any airstrikes in the area and called the incident a "completely staged provocation" to elicit anti-Russian sentiment in the West.

The Russian justification for the bombing was widely rejected by the international community, including NATO countries and other Western allies. The White House, the Vatican, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees all condemned the attack, with Cardinal Pietro Parolin stating, "I say bombing a hospital is unacceptable. There are no reasons, there are no motivations to do this." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Western leaders, and human rights organizations described the bombing as a war crime and an act of genocide.

Where Was Kylie Jenner Born?

You may want to see also

shunhospital

The international community's response

On 9 March 2022, the Russian Air Force bombed Maternity Hospital No. 3 in Mariupol, Ukraine, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The hospital served as both a children's hospital and a maternity ward. The attack killed at least four people, injured at least sixteen, and resulted in at least one stillbirth. The international community responded with widespread condemnation and outrage:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Josep Borrell (European Union Head of Foreign Affairs), and British Armed Forces Minister James Heappey described the bombing as a "war crime". The European Union expressed its support for Ukraine and condemned Russia's actions. Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis tweeted that Greece was ready to rebuild the maternity hospital and that Mariupol was "a symbol of the barbarity of the war". The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) published a report confirming that the maternity hospital was clearly identifiable and operational, concluding that Russia had committed a war crime.

International media outlets also expressed outrage, with newspapers such as the Daily Mirror, The Independent, the Daily Express, and the Daily Mail using words like "barbaric" and "depraved" to describe the attack. Italian newspaper Il Giornale went so far as to call Putin a "war criminal".

The attack was documented by journalists Mstyslav Chernov and his colleagues, who were the last international journalists reporting from inside Mariupol as Russian troops moved in. Their documentary, "20 Days in Mariupol," premiered in the US on PBS stations on November 21, 2023, and has since been made available online. Chernov and his team won a Pulitzer Prize for their reporting, which included footage of the destroyed hospital, distraught mothers and children, and injured pregnant women.

The international community also responded to Russia's justification for the bombing. On March 10, the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defence claimed that the bombing was justified by the alleged presence of Ukrainian armed forces at the hospital. However, several media organizations dismissed these claims as false, and Ukrainian officials provided evidence that the hospital was functional and had no military presence.

shunhospital

The impact on civilians

On March 9, 2022, the Russian Air Force bombed Maternity Hospital No. 3, a hospital complex functioning as a children's hospital and maternity ward in Mariupol, Ukraine. The attack killed at least four people, injured at least sixteen, and led to at least one stillbirth. The impact of this attack on civilians was profound and far-reaching.

The bombing caused extensive damage to the hospital, with video footage showing much of the front of the building ripped away, mangled cars burning outside, and hospital wards reduced to wreckage. The attack also disrupted essential medical services for civilians, with medical equipment covered in rubble and windows blown out.

The human toll of the attack was devastating. Among the injured were women in labour and a pregnant woman who was grievously wounded and later died, along with her baby. The attack caused panic and distress among mothers and children, with journalists documenting distraught mothers and children at the site.

The bombing also had broader implications for the civilian population in Mariupol. It hindered evacuation efforts, as the attack occurred during a ceasefire intended to allow civilians safe passage out of the city. The deputy mayor of Mariupol reported that the Russian army had "shot and bombed" the humanitarian corridor, mined the road, and installed checkpoints, hindering the evacuation of civilians.

The attack also contributed to the overall apocalyptic and catastrophic conditions in the city, as described by the Red Cross and Ukrainian officials. It exacerbated the suffering and devastation faced by civilians, with reports of corpses lying unburied in the streets, hungry residents breaking into stores for food, and thousands sheltering in basements.

The bombing of the maternity hospital had a profound and lasting impact on the civilian population in Mariupol, causing direct harm to those seeking medical care, disrupting essential services, and hindering evacuation efforts. The attack also contributed to the overall deterioration of living conditions and increased the sense of fear and insecurity among the civilian population in the city.

shunhospital

The role of the media in documenting the event

On March 9, 2022, Russian forces bombed Maternity Hospital No. 3 in Mariupol, Ukraine, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The hospital served as both a children's hospital and a maternity ward. The attack killed at least four people and injured at least sixteen, resulting in at least one stillbirth.

The media played a crucial role in documenting and bringing attention to this tragic event. Mstyslav Chernov, a Ukrainian AP video journalist, along with his colleagues, was among the journalists who stayed in Mariupol and documented the aftermath of the bombing. They captured the devastation of the hospital, the panic and distress of mothers and children, and the efforts of first responders to save and comfort the injured. Chernov's footage included a pregnant woman being carried out of the hospital on a stretcher, her face pale, and her hands clutching her injured pelvis. Unfortunately, both she and her baby succumbed to their injuries.

Chernov and his colleagues' reporting sparked global outrage and brought attention to the human toll of the war and the rampant human rights abuses occurring in Ukraine. Their documentation of the event led to them winning a Pulitzer Prize for their courageous and impactful journalism.

Other media organizations, such as FRONTLINE and The Associated Press, also played a vital role in gathering, verifying, and documenting evidence of potential war crimes in Ukraine, including the bombing of the maternity hospital. Their work contributed to holding perpetrators accountable and raising awareness about the situation in Ukraine.

Despite the extensive media coverage and documentation, Russian officials denied the attack and made false claims that the hospital was used as a base for the Azov Battalion and that the wounded pregnant women documented by journalists were "crisis actors." However, their claims were refuted by media organizations and contradicted by the evidence captured by journalists on the ground.

Explore related products

War As I Knew It

$0.75 $19.99

shunhospital

On March 9, 2022, the Russian Air Force bombed a hospital complex in Mariupol, Ukraine, functioning as both a children's hospital and a maternity ward. The attack killed at least four people and injured at least sixteen, leading to at least one stillbirth.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Josep Borrell (European Union head of Foreign Affairs), and British Armed Forces Minister James Heappey described the bombing as a war crime. However, the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defence claimed that the bombing was justified due to the alleged presence of Ukrainian armed forces at the hospital. This claim was dismissed as false by several media organizations.

The Russian journalist Alexander Nevzorov was charged under Russia's "false information" law after he published information about the Russian shelling of the maternity hospital in Mariupol. Under a new law passed on March 4, he could face up to 15 years in prison. This case illustrates the legal consequences that Russian journalists may face for reporting on controversial or sensitive issues, particularly when their reporting contradicts the official narrative of the Russian government.

Russia has a history of limiting press freedom and suppressing dissent. While the Russian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and prohibits censorship, in practice, the authorities have significant discretion to suppress speech and activities that lack official support, often under the guise of ambiguous extremism laws. Russian prosecutors have a custom of charging journalists with trumped-up criminal offenses, including defamation and extremism, to deter and limit their activities. The country ranks 164 out of 180 countries in the Press Freedom Index, indicating a challenging environment for journalists.

Russian journalists who report on controversial issues or criticize the government may face legal harassment, intimidation, or even physical harm. Self-censorship is widespread due to the risk of invoking vague extremism laws or running afoul of powerful interests. The government also dominates the media landscape, controlling the majority of national television networks, radio, and print outlets, further limiting the space for independent journalism.

In conclusion, the case of Alexander Nevzorov is indicative of the legal consequences that Russian journalists may face for reporting on sensitive issues. The Russian government's broad interpretation of extremism, selective enforcement of laws, and control over the media landscape create a challenging environment for journalists seeking to report independently and critically.

Frequently asked questions

On March 9, 2022, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Air Force bombed Maternity Hospital No. 3 in Mariupol, Ukraine, killing at least four people and injuring at least sixteen, including women in labour. The Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defence claimed that the bombing was justified by the supposed presence of Ukrainian armed forces at the hospital. However, several media organizations dismissed these claims as false.

The bombing of the maternity hospital in Mariupol triggered global horror and outrage. The Vatican's Secretary of State called the bombing "unacceptable," while British Prime Minister Boris Johnson described the attack as "depraved." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the bombing "genocide" and a "war crime."

The bombing caused colossal damage to the hospital, with video footage showing much of the front of the building ripped away and mangled cars burning outside. Hospital wards were reduced to wreckage, with collapsed walls, rubble covering medical equipment, and shattered glass everywhere. At least 17 people were wounded in the attack, and a pregnant woman and her baby died as a result.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment