Rove's Hospital Visits: A Dangerous Trend

Republican strategist and Fox News commentator Karl Rove made headlines in 2014 when he questioned Hillary Clinton's health, suggesting that her 30-day hospital stay and subsequent use of special glasses indicated a possible traumatic brain injury. However, Rove's claims were inaccurate, as Clinton only spent four days in the hospital and the glasses were an optional treatment for temporary double vision issues common after concussions. This incident sparked discussions about the scrutiny faced by political figures, especially in the context of a potential presidential run.

Karl Rove's comments on Hillary Clinton's health

In 2014, Karl Rove, a Republican strategist, made comments regarding Hillary Clinton's health that sparked controversy and incensed liberals. Rove questioned Clinton's health following a mild concussion in 2012, claiming she spent "30 days in the hospital" and reappeared wearing glasses indicative of traumatic brain injury. However, Rove's claim was inaccurate, as Clinton actually spent about four days in the hospital.

Rove stood by his comments, suggesting that Clinton's health could potentially impede her ability to govern if she were elected president in 2016. He clarified that he was not questioning her mental capacity but rather highlighting the potential impact of her physical and mental health. Nick Merrill, Clinton's spokesperson, strongly criticized Rove's comments, accusing him of deceiving the country with lies.

Rove's remarks sparked a backlash, with fellow Republican Bill Kristol admonishing him for weighing in on Clinton's health. Kristol stated that people could assess Clinton's health for themselves and saw no reason for Rove to speculate. Rove's comments also faced criticism from Democrats, with Senator Claire McCaskill suggesting that Rove was "struggling to stay relevant" and engaging in "cheap shots".

Amid the controversy, Rove insisted that he was not questioning Clinton's health but rather the certainty of her presidential run. He argued that her age and the potential toll of governing for two terms were valid considerations. Rove's comments reflected a broader focus on Clinton's health by Republicans, with RNC head Reince Priebus acknowledging that health and age would be factors in the 2016 election. While Priebus stopped short of directly addressing Rove's remarks, he agreed that Clinton's health would be a topic of discussion.

Clinton's 30-day hospital stay

Speculation about Bill Clinton's health has been a topic of public debate for decades. Clinton has been open about his struggles with multiple sclerosis and heart problems, which have resulted in numerous hospital stays. One of his notable hospitalisations was in 2004 when he suffered a heart attack, and again in 2008 for surgery to repair a damaged aorta. In 1993, while serving as President, Clinton was hospitalised at the White House for a mild case of pneumonia, sparking concerns about his health and its potential impact on his presidency.

In the case of Hillary Clinton, there have also been instances where her health has raised concerns. In 2012, she spent time in the hospital after suffering a mild concussion. While there were rumours and speculation about a 30-day hospital stay, it has been clarified that she was actually in the hospital for about four days. During this time, she was treated for a blood clot in her head, which was discovered after she fainted at home due to a stomach virus.

The incident surrounding Hillary Clinton's hospitalisation and her appearance with glasses afterwards sparked further discussion. Republican strategist Karl Rove questioned whether Clinton's health, specifically her mild concussion, indicated a more serious issue. He referenced her 30-day hospital stay and the fact that she started wearing glasses associated with traumatic brain injuries. However, these claims were deemed inaccurate, as Clinton's hospital stay was much shorter, and the glasses are an optional treatment for temporary double vision, which can occur after a concussion.

While the exact duration of Hillary Clinton's hospital stay in 2012 may be shorter than initially speculated, it nonetheless sparked conversations about the importance of transparency in the health of public figures, especially those seeking political office. This incident highlights the delicate balance between an individual's right to privacy and the public's right to know, particularly when it comes to the well-being of potential leaders.

Clinton's glasses for traumatic brain injury

In 2012, Hillary Clinton suffered a concussion after fainting due to a stomach virus and hitting her head. Doctors later discovered a blood clot in her brain, which was treated with blood thinners. Following her injury, Clinton wore special glasses during her testimony at a House hearing on the Benghazi, Libya, attack. These glasses, according to Republican strategist Karl Rove, are "only for people who have traumatic brain injuries." Rove's comments sparked concerns about Clinton's health, especially as she was a potential presidential candidate at the time.

While Rove never explicitly stated that Clinton had brain damage, he implied that her concussion and subsequent use of the glasses indicated a more severe medical condition. Rove also exaggerated Clinton's hospital stay, claiming she spent 30 days in the hospital when, in reality, it was only four days. This combination of factors led to his comment being rated as "false" by PolitiFact.

The glasses Clinton wore are typically used to treat temporary double vision, a common symptom of concussions and other conditions. They are known as post-concussion glasses or prismatic glasses, and they are designed to relieve symptoms and aid in rehabilitating vision following a concussion or traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, experts emphasize that these glasses do not indicate cognitive status and that most people with concussions fully recover.

While Clinton's glasses may have been related to her concussion, neurologists and researchers agree that vision-related issues are common after mild traumatic brain injuries. Symptoms can include blurred vision, light sensitivity, headaches, and eye movement problems. In Clinton's case, the glasses were likely prescribed to address any vision-related issues stemming from her concussion and subsequent blood clot.

Clinton's experience highlights the importance of addressing vision-related symptoms following head injuries. While the glasses can provide relief, it is crucial to consult with medical professionals to ensure proper diagnosis and treatment.

Clinton's concussion and blood clot

In 2012, Hillary Clinton suffered a concussion after fainting due to a stomach virus that left her weak and dehydrated. During a follow-up visit, doctors spotted a blood clot in a vein in the space between her brain and skull behind her right ear. This type of clot, called sinus venous thrombosis, is relatively uncommon but can occur after an injury like a fall or concussion. It is treated with blood thinners, and Clinton was admitted to New York-Presbyterian Hospital for several days to monitor her medication and ensure proper hydration.

Clinton's condition sparked concerns about her health, especially as she was a potential presidential candidate at the time. Republican strategist Karl Rove questioned Clinton's health, claiming she spent 30 days in the hospital and wore glasses indicative of traumatic brain injury. However, Rove's claims were inaccurate, as Clinton only spent about four days in the hospital, and the glasses were for temporary problems of double vision, a common issue after concussions.

Clinton herself addressed the concussion and blood clot scare, stating that all side effects disappeared within months of the accident. In a 2014 interview, she affirmed that she had no lingering effects from the concussion. Neurologists also confirmed that most people recover fully from such injuries, and with modern treatment, over 80% have a good neurologic outcome.

Clinton's blood clot did not lead to any long-term consequences or neurological damage. Her doctors treated her with blood thinners, and she was released once the proper dosage was determined. This incident highlights the scrutiny that public figures, especially those running for political office, face regarding their health and well-being.

Rove's claim being inaccurate

In 2014, Karl Rove, a Republican strategist and Fox News commentator, made claims about Hillary Clinton's health during a speech at an event near Los Angeles. Rove stated that Clinton spent "30 days in the hospital" in 2012 and that she reappeared wearing "glasses that are only for people who have traumatic brain injury".

However, these claims by Rove are inaccurate. Clinton was actually in the hospital for about four days, not 30. The glasses she wore are an optional treatment for temporary problems of double vision that can occur after a concussion, and most people recover fully. While Rove never explicitly stated that Clinton had brain damage, he implied that her injury was more serious than it was by exaggerating the length of her hospital stay and the nature of her injury.

Rove's comments were made in the context of Clinton's potential presidential run, and he suggested that her health should be part of any presidential vetting process. Many people interpreted his comments as implying that Clinton had suffered brain damage or a traumatic brain injury. While it is true that Clinton had a concussion in 2012 and did wear glasses related to that injury, the length of her hospital stay and the nature of her injury were exaggerated by Rove.

In response to Rove's claims, a State Department spokesman clarified that Clinton's glasses were related to issues stemming from her concussion, and that she had not worn them for some time. Neurologists also confirmed that most people with similar injuries fully recover. As such, Rove's claim that Clinton spent 30 days in the hospital and that her glasses indicated a traumatic brain injury is false and misleading.

Frequently asked questions