Hospitals Can't Commit You For Not Eating: Here's Why

Eating disorders are a serious mental health issue that can lead to physical health complications and even death. While patients can refuse treatment, in some cases, individuals with severe and life-threatening eating disorders may be involuntarily committed to a hospital for treatment. This process, known as civil or involuntary commitment, is a complex legal procedure that varies from state to state. It is often challenging to obtain involuntary commitment for eating disorders as individuals often present themselves well and do not express a desire to die. However, it is a temporary loss of autonomy that can ultimately save lives. While in the hospital, patients are provided with medical stabilization through IV fluids and nutrition before addressing the psychological, emotional, and behavioral aspects of their illness.

Involuntary commitment for eating disorders is a complex legal process

Involuntary commitment, also known as civil commitment, is a legal process by which an individual with symptoms of a serious mental disorder is involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric hospital for treatment. This process is particularly complex when it comes to eating disorders, as individuals with severe eating disorders often present themselves well, are intelligent and articulate, and do not express a desire to die. This can make it challenging for legal and medical professionals to distinguish an eating disorder from normalized weight concerns.

Eating disorders can lead to serious mental and physical health consequences and can even be fatal if left untreated. Despite this, many individuals with eating disorders deny or are unable to understand the seriousness of their disorder, leading them to refuse treatment. In such cases, involuntary commitment may be the only way to ensure they receive the necessary treatment.

However, obtaining involuntary commitment for an individual with an eating disorder can be difficult. This is partly due to the lack of knowledge about eating disorders among legal and medical professionals, as well as the fact that individuals with eating disorders often provide rational explanations for their behavior. Additionally, there may be concerns about invading the liberty and privacy of the patient who refuses treatment.

In the United States, all fifty states have laws on involuntary commitment for individuals with serious mental health disorders, but the specific laws and criteria vary from state to state. When considering involuntary commitment, it is important to first talk directly and compassionately with the affected individual and seek legal advice if necessary. While involuntary commitment may negatively impact relationships, it can ultimately be life-saving.

Refusal to eat is morally wrong unless the patient is mentally incompetent

In the case of mentally competent individuals, the refusal to eat is considered morally wrong. Hospitals have a duty to intervene and provide care, even if it means force-feeding the patient. This intervention is supported by the courts, which allow for such actions in the best interest of the patient. However, it's important to note that force-feeding may be considered an extraordinary means in certain cases, such as the patient's age or physical condition, where avoidance of treatment could be justified.

On the other hand, if a patient is deemed mentally incompetent, their refusal to eat may not be considered a fully rational act. In such cases, hospitals refraining from force-feeding would not be interpreted as cooperation in suicide since an incompetent patient cannot make such a decision. Involuntary commitment, also known as civil commitment, can be pursued in these situations, where individuals with severe and life-threatening eating disorders or mental disorders are committed to a psychiatric hospital for treatment against their will.

Obtaining involuntary commitment can be challenging, especially in the case of eating disorders, as individuals often present themselves well and provide rational explanations for their behavior. Additionally, distinguishing an eating disorder from societal norms and ideals of thinness can be difficult for legal and medical professionals without specialized knowledge. Nonetheless, involuntary commitment can be a life-saving intervention, and healthcare providers are encouraged to collaborate and build connections with professionals specializing in eating disorders to provide the best care for their patients.

While patients generally have the right to refuse hospitalization, civil commitment laws in some states allow providers to petition the court to commit a patient to inpatient treatment if they pose an immediate threat to their own life or the lives of others. This process involves seeking legal assistance and considering the patient's perspective on involuntary commitment. It is important to approach this complex issue with compassion and respect for the patient's autonomy while also prioritizing their physical and mental well-being.

Patients with eating disorders often present themselves well, making involuntary commitment difficult

Involuntary commitment, also known as civil commitment, is a legal process by which an individual with symptoms of a serious mental disorder is involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric hospital for treatment. This process is particularly challenging for individuals with eating disorders, who often present themselves well and are intelligent and articulate. They may also offer rational explanations for their behaviour and do not express a desire to die. This makes it difficult for legal and medical professionals to distinguish an eating disorder from normal weight concerns, especially given societal ideals of thinness.

Anorexia nervosa, for example, rarely leads to involuntary commitment. Clinicians may be unsure whether these patients qualify for hospitalization as they are not usually psychotic. Many statutes require the imminence of risk, which can be challenging to establish in patients with chronic starvation. Anorexic patients also often do not resemble those who are suicidal or gravely disabled, as they can provide rationales for their behaviour. Unless an anorexic patient is explicitly suicidal, there is often reluctance to hospitalize them involuntarily.

The National Eating Disorders Association highlights the complexities of involuntary commitment for individuals with eating disorders. While it may be life-saving, it can also negatively impact relationships and the individual may not recognize the necessity of the intervention. Involuntary commitment should be considered when an individual's eating disorder is severe and life-threatening, and they refuse treatment. However, timing is crucial, and involuntary commitment may be harmful if implemented when the individual is already contemplating recovery.

Despite the challenges, involuntary commitment can be a critical step in ensuring that individuals with severe eating disorders receive the treatment they need. It is important to remember that this is a temporary loss of autonomy and that a supportive environment during and after commitment is vital for the patient's perception of the experience.

Medical stabilisation in a hospital is sometimes necessary before addressing psychological aspects

Eating disorders are the only mental illnesses regularly accompanied by severe, life-threatening medical complications. Significant medical instability results from progressive malnutrition, starvation, purging, and overexercise, compromising virtually all of the body's vital organs and systems. This instability can lead to severe gastrointestinal symptoms, impaired bowel function, and electrolyte abnormalities, which can result in refeeding syndrome or hypoglycemia, both potentially fatal conditions.

Given these risks, medical stabilization is often the first step in treating eating disorders, especially in patients with severely low weight, serious medical complications, or a risk of refeeding syndrome. This process involves interventions to stabilize vital signs and restore organ function, and address malnutrition's gastrointestinal and cardiac impacts. Telemetry, for example, allows for 24/7 cardiac monitoring, helping to quickly identify and treat cardiopulmonary abnormalities.

Education is also a critical component of medical stabilization. Physicians answer patients' questions, explain medical complications, and provide insights into what is happening to their bodies during treatment. This understanding can help patients feel more comfortable with the process and enhance their recovery journey.

While involuntary commitment is a complex and challenging process, it may be necessary for individuals with severe and life-threatening eating disorders who refuse treatment. This legal process can be life-saving, but it may also negatively impact relationships. Ultimately, while medical stabilization addresses the physical complications of eating disorders, ongoing psychological support and intervention are crucial for comprehensive recovery.

Hospitals may provide nutrition through an IV for patients unable to eat orally

IV nutrition therapy can include a range of nutrients, such as vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and electrolytes. The specific combination of nutrients used is tailored to the patient's needs and medical condition. It is typically administered in a hospital or medical clinic by a trained medical professional, but can also be done at home in certain cases. Before starting IV nutrition treatment, a patient's weight and fluid balance are recorded, and blood is drawn to measure electrolyte levels and organ function. This information helps healthcare providers determine the appropriate IV nutrition solution for the patient.

IV nutrition is typically started in the hospital as a continuous infusion over 24 hours. Once a patient's body can tolerate IV nutrition, it can be administered at home for 10 to 14 hours per day. However, it is important to note that IV nutrition is not without risks. Possible side effects may include infection, bleeding, or allergic reactions to the substances being administered. One of the most common complications of long-term IV nutrition is parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease (PNALD), which affects up to 50% of patients after five to seven years. Other complications include gallbladder problems and bone demineralization.

While IV nutrition can be a life-saving treatment for patients who are unable to eat orally, it is not a long-term solution. Healthcare providers will work to gradually transition patients to enteral feeding (tube feeding) or oral feeding as soon as their bodies can tolerate it. This gradual transition helps to avoid the long-term complications associated with IV nutrition.

Frequently asked questions