The Impact Of Managed Care On Hospital Utilization

Managed care is a healthcare insurance approach that integrates healthcare financing and the delivery of care and related services to keep the costs to the purchaser at a minimum while delivering what is appropriate for a patient or population. The goal of managed care is to generate revenue by controlling costs and overutilizing hospital services. Managed care has been associated with a reduction in inpatient procedures, lower inpatient complications, and reduced mortality rates. However, there is no definitive conclusion as to whether managed care improves or worsens access to or quality of care for beneficiaries. Managed care has also been linked to increased prescription drug utilization and higher spending.

Managed care and inpatient procedures

Managed care refers to a healthcare insurance approach that integrates healthcare financing and the delivery of care and related services to keep the costs to the purchaser at a minimum while delivering what is appropriate for a patient or population. Managed care covers a broad spectrum of activities, including greater integration of healthcare delivery, cost containment by limiting unnecessary utilization, limited fee-for-service, sharing of risk with providers, financial incentives to providers, and accountability for plan performance.

The main goal of managed care is to generate revenue by controlling costs and overutilizing hospital services. Managed care organizations (MCOs) are accountable for providing access to care for their enrollees and are required to implement initiatives to improve the quality of care delivery. However, certain aspects of managed care, such as defined provider networks and incentives to contain costs, may counteract these objectives.

In the context of inpatient procedures, managed care has been associated with a reduction in utilization, especially among Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries. This decrease in inpatient utilization has resulted in lower inpatient complications and reduced mortality rates for conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, and congestive heart failure.

The decline in inpatient utilization under managed care can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, managed care encourages providers to prioritize preventive and appropriate care to avoid expensive hospital stays. Capitation, a payment system in managed care, provides a set amount per enrollee, incentivizing providers to keep enrollees healthy and costs within the capitation rate. This approach may also lead to undertreatment to minimize treatment costs and a focus on enrolling healthier patients.

Additionally, managed care plans employ utilization review and management strategies, such as concurrent utilization review for inpatient cases. UM/UR nurses play a crucial role in gathering information, coordinating medical services, and planning discharge to comply with length-of-stay guidelines, ultimately contributing to cost savings and revenue generation for hospitals.

While managed care has been linked to reduced inpatient utilization and improved outcomes, it is important to note that the impact on access to and quality of care is still debated. Some studies suggest that managed care can decrease overspending and oversupply in healthcare, while others argue that it may create disincentives for providers and negatively affect patient care. Overall, managed care has had a significant influence on inpatient procedures, shifting the focus towards cost containment and efficient utilization of hospital services.

Managed care and prescription drug use

Managed care has had a significant impact on hospital utilization, with a particular focus on reducing costs and improving efficiency. One of the primary goals of managed care organizations (MCOs) is to control costs by limiting unnecessary hospital utilization. This includes reducing inpatient days and encouraging the use of preventive services such as vaccinations and disease screenings.

The impact of managed care on prescription drug use is an important aspect of its overall effect on hospital utilization. Managed care pharmacy organizations aim to enhance patient health outcomes while optimizing limited healthcare resources. They employ strategies such as discounted prices at network pharmacies, patient copays, and data collection to optimize medication use.

One study found that a county-level mandate to enroll in managed care resulted in increased prescription drug utilization, particularly for medications related to chronic conditions. This was attributed to MCOs allowing beneficiaries to obtain more prescriptions than the strict limits of traditional fee-for-service (FFS) plans. Additionally, managed care plans often provide coverage for a broader range of prescription drugs, which can increase utilization rates.

However, it is important to note that managed care plans also have strategies to promote the affordability of prescription drugs. They often develop networks of preferred pharmacies that offer lower out-of-pocket costs for patients. Additionally, formularies are used to promote the use of low-cost generic medications and preferred brands through tiering, which assigns lower copays to lower-cost drugs. These strategies help to control costs for both patients and MCOs.

Furthermore, managed care organizations use clinical and scientific evidence to determine the appropriate use of medications. They conduct research to identify cost-effective medications and optimize the use of healthcare resources. This includes utilizing drug utilization review, generic substitution, and formularies to manage pharmacy costs.

In conclusion, managed care has had a significant impact on prescription drug use, with MCOs employing various strategies to enhance patient health outcomes, control costs, and optimize the utilization of healthcare resources. While managed care has resulted in increased prescription drug utilization, particularly for chronic conditions, it also provides tools to promote affordability and appropriate medication use.

Managed care's impact on hospital revenue

Managed care refers to a healthcare insurance approach that combines healthcare financing and the delivery of care to keep costs to a minimum while delivering appropriate care to patients. Managed care organizations (MCOs) are paid a set amount per enrollee, incentivizing them to keep enrollees healthy and avoid costly hospital stays and emergency department visits.

The impact of managed care on hospital revenue is complex and multifaceted. On the one hand, managed care aims to control costs and generate revenue for hospitals by reducing inpatient days and overutilization of hospital services. This can lead to decreased inpatient complications and mortality rates, as seen in the American Hospital Association study. Additionally, MCOs can improve hospital revenue by negotiating discounted rates with providers, including hospitals, in exchange for the opportunity to be listed as in-network providers.

However, the shift to managed care has also been associated with decreased rates of hospitalization, which may impact hospital revenue. Hospitals may experience reduced inpatient days and lower utilization of inpatient procedures, particularly among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. This reduction in inpatient procedures can result in decreased revenue for hospitals, especially those heavily reliant on inpatient services.

Furthermore, the capitated payment system used by MCOs, where they receive a set amount per enrollee, may create incentives to undertreat patients to minimize costs. MCOs may also seek to enroll primarily healthy patients while discouraging the participation of high-risk or high-utilizing enrollees, further impacting hospital revenue.

Overall, the impact of managed care on hospital revenue is mixed. While it can lead to cost savings and improved efficiency, it may also result in reduced hospitalization rates and potential undertreatment of patients, affecting the revenue streams of hospitals. The success of managed care in generating revenue for hospitals depends on various factors, including the specific MCO, the patient population, and the effectiveness of cost-control measures.

Managed care and patient choice

Managed care refers to a healthcare insurance approach that combines healthcare financing and the delivery of care to keep costs to the purchaser at a minimum while delivering what is appropriate for a patient or population. Managed care organizations (MCOs) are accountable for providing access to care for their enrollees and are required to implement initiatives to improve the quality of care delivery.

The impact of managed care on patient choice is complex. On the one hand, patients have more autonomy in making care decisions related to selecting subspecialty providers. The network of providers available to patients under managed care is typically more extensive than in traditional health maintenance organizations (HMOs). This expanded network can enhance patient choice and flexibility in selecting their healthcare providers.

However, patients are still limited to receiving care from in-network providers, which may restrict their options. Additionally, in an HMO with a gatekeeper model, coverage is typically only available for care and services authorized by a primary care provider (PCP). While some more modern HMOs allow self-referral to specialists, patients are still generally confined to network providers for their care.

The impact of managed care on patient choice can also be seen in the context of prescription drugs. MCOs may allow beneficiaries to obtain more prescriptions than traditional fee-for-service (FFS) models, which strictly limit the number of prescriptions per month. This increased access to medications can provide patients with more choices and flexibility in managing their health conditions.

Furthermore, managed care has been associated with higher rates of preventive services utilization, such as vaccinations and disease screenings, in the general population. This suggests that patients may be more proactive in seeking preventative care and have greater access to such services, potentially improving health outcomes.

However, some critics argue that managed care may create incentives for undertreatment to minimize costs. This could potentially limit patient access to necessary treatments and impact their health outcomes. Additionally, capitated plans may seek to enrol healthier patients while discouraging the participation of disabled or high-utilizing enrollees, which could affect patient choice and access to care for certain populations.

In conclusion, managed care has both expanded and limited patient choice in various ways. While patients may have greater autonomy in selecting providers and accessing certain services, they are still confined to the constraints of provider networks and utilization targets. The impact of managed care on patient choice is multifaceted, and further research is needed to understand its comprehensive effects.

Managed care and provider incentives

Managed care refers to a healthcare insurance approach that integrates healthcare financing and the delivery of care and related services to keep the costs to the purchaser at a minimum while delivering what is appropriate for a patient or population. The goal of managed care is to generate revenue by controlling costs and overutilizing hospital services. Managed care covers a broad spectrum of activities, including the greater integration of healthcare delivery, cost containment by limiting unnecessary utilization, limited fee-for-service, sharing of risk with providers, financial incentives to providers, and accountability for plan performance.

The term managed care encompasses a diverse array of institutional arrangements, which combine various sets of mechanisms that have changed over time. Managed care has a long history. For an extended period, this form of organization was discouraged by a hostile regulatory environment. Since the early 1980s, however, managed care has grown dramatically. Neither theoretical nor empirical research has yet provided an explanation for this pattern of growth. The growth of managed care may be due to its relative success in responding to underlying market failures in healthcare.

Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) are accountable for providing access to care for their enrollees. They are also required to implement initiatives to improve the quality of care delivery. However, certain aspects of managed care, including defined provider networks and incentives to contain costs, may counteract these objectives. Outcomes for access and quality of care vary not only by MCO but also by service and are affected by a variety of factors.

MCOs have the ability to allow beneficiaries to obtain more prescriptions than are allowed in FFS, which strictly limits beneficiaries to three per month. A study examining the transition to Medicaid managed care in South Carolina found that managed care was associated with an increase in preventable ER visits driven by asthma. Another study of youths with type 1 diabetes enrolled in Medicaid managed care found that they were less likely to be readmitted within 90 days of discharge than similar patients in FFS, indicating improved quality.

Some argue that capitation provides incentives to undertreat patients to minimize treatment costs. Capitated plans may also seek to enroll as many healthy patients as possible and discourage the participation of disabled or high-utilizing enrollees. However, others suggest that capitation does not provide incentives to overtreat patients as in FFS. Instead, managed care encourages providers to keep enrollees healthy to keep costs within the capitation rate through preventive and appropriate care to avoid expensive hospital stays and emergency department visits. Capitation also provides more certainty when budgeting and encourages the efficient use of services.

Frequently asked questions